Introducing FactMarshal
AI litigation intelligence that turns the case file into a verified fact record — dated, cited, and cross-examined for contradictions.
Read the entry →The docket
Notes from the record.
Litigation practice, legal AI, and building software that shows its work.
“Show your work” is the only acceptable standard for AI in litigation
Why citation-first design — every fact pinned to a source page — is the line between AI you can file and AI you have to apologize for.
Read the entry →ABA Opinion 512: six everyday practices it quietly made risky
The ABA's first formal guidance on generative AI touches competence, confidentiality, communication, candor, fees, and supervision. A practical compliance roadmap for litigation firms.
Read the entry →Building client trust in the AI age
Clients don't distrust AI — they distrust corner-cutting they can't see. A practical playbook for talking to clients about AI-assisted legal work.
Read the entry →The black box problem: why legal AI needs glass walls
Most legal AI can't explain its decisions. In a profession built on showing your reasoning, that isn't a quirk — it's disqualifying. Here's what transparency actually requires, and five questions to ask any vendor.
Read the entry →The documents that aren't there: discovery gap analysis
The most dangerous documents in discovery are the ones that were never produced. How gap analysis finds the holes in a production before they find you.
Read the entry →